The Barnes Review January/February 2026

Price range: $7.00 through $12.00

The Barnes Review

A JOURNAL OF POLITICALLY INCORRECT HISTORY

January/February 2026 ❖ Volume XXXII ❖ Number 1

- +

The Barnes Review

A JOURNAL OF POLITICALLY INCORRECT HISTORY

January/February 2026 ❖ Volume XXXII ❖ Number 1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

‘WHITE SUPREMACISM’ AND THE RACIAL CIVILIZATIONAL GAP

By Arthur Kemp. “White supremacism” is one of the most abused phrases of the present-day. But where does it come from, and what does it actually mean? Did it really originate in “slavery” as the far left insists, or did it come about because of the massive cultural, technological, and civilizational gaps which existed between the races during the Age of Discovery?

BRITAIN’S FORGOTTEN 1919 RACE RIOTS

By Thomas Redfern. The “Great Replacement” currently underway in Britain and elsewhere has a long history. Here, TBR looks back on the “test run” carried out by the establishment during World War I, when racially foreign immigrants were deliberately imported into the UK to replace White British workers who were away fighting at the front. Predictably, this caused a violent reaction among the demobilized men.

THE TRUTH ABOUT LYNCHING IN THE ANTEBELLUM SOUTH

By Winfield H. Collins. Modern propaganda would have us believe that “lynchings” in the Deep South were all about White mobs hanging Negroes. Yet the truth has long been publicly available, as this remarkable essay, originally published in 1918 by Prof. Winfield H. Collins, shows: namely that extra-judicial lynchings of people in the West far outnumbered those in the South, and Whites were the majority of lynching victims.

THE REAL MARY PHAGAN STORY: DESCENDANT DEBUNKS FALSEHOODS, INTERVIEW

By James Edwards. Everyone knows the Jewish Anti-Defamation League’s claim that it was set up after the “innocent” Leo Frank was lynched for the murder of young Mary Phagan in 1913. In this exclusive interview, the grand-niece and namesake of Mary Phagan explains exactly how guilty Frank was, and how the entire event has been distorted for propaganda purposes.

PRIEST CHALLENGES THE RISE OF ZIONIST POWER IN AMERICA

By Antonius J. Patrick. Fr. Leonard Feeney was a rising star in the Catholic Church in America, described by one of his superiors as the “the greatest theologian we have in the U.S. by far.” But when he began speaking out about the emergence of Jewish power in America in the first part of the 20th century he was ostracized.

BRITISH EMPIRE DRAGS COLONIES INTO BLOODY, TRAGIC RACE WAR

By Marc Roland. The real “First World War” was not the 1914–1918 conflict, but the War of the Spanish Succession (1701–1714) and the French and Indian War, a subsection of the Seven Years’ War (1754–1763). Here, historian Marc Roland reveals the political ramifications and inadvertent racial consequences of these conflicts.

FLYING WITH THE LUFTWAFFE: LT. GOTTFRIED DULIAS

Interview by James Edwards. As time goes by, there are fewer and fewer surviving WWII vets. TBR’s James Edwards was, however, able to interview pilot Gottfried Dulias before the Luftwaffe officer died. We know you will enjoy reading what Dulias had to say in this exclusive TBR print interview.

UNBRIDLED LUST FOR REVENGE MAKES A MOCKERY OF NUREMBERG TRIALS

By John Wear, J.D. In this analysis, World War II researcher John Wear reveals the remarkable dominance of Jews among the prosecutors, “evidence” gatherers, and general personnel of the Nuremberg trials. Their presence made the process a mockery of justice, with the aggrieved parties making up the “judge, jury and executioners” in violation of established legal norms.

GENEVIÈVE DE GALARD-TERRAUBE: ‘THE ANGEL OF DIEN BIEN PHU

By Rémi Tremblay. In the rough and tumble of the French Indo-China War of 1946 to 1954, a large group of brave young French women formed the “convoyeuses de l’air”: flying nurses who volunteered, at great personal risk, to evacuate wounded soldiers to hospitals or back to mainland France. One of them, Geneviève de Galard-Terraube, achieved fame after being caught up in the fall of the French headquarters at Dien Bien Phu. Here is her remarkable story, which culminated in national heroine status.

Features:
Personal from the Editor ● Editorial: ‘White Supremacy’ ● Lunchtime in the Congo ● Frontier Justice ● Mass Hanging of Whites ● History You May Have Missed ● American Genius Unleashed ● The Eichmann Travesty ● Well-Deserved Recognition ● Letters to the Editor 

From The Barnes Review, January/February 2026

THE BANE OF ‘WHITE SUPREMACY’

When White adventurers set out to explore the world in the late 1400s, they did so in expertly constructed but relatively tiny wooden sailing craft, braving the wicked seas and foul weather. Scurvy, disease, and malnutrition took their toll, leading to high mortality rates among the crew members.

At first, inaccurate or non-existent maps, previously uncharted waters, hurricanes, typhoons and coral reefs posed the threat of shipwreck or ending up at the bottom of the briny depths.

Yet none of these things could stop White swashbucklers from venturing out onto the vast oceans in an effort to discover the true extent of the globe.

On land, White explorers conquered rugged terrain, swollen rivers and inclement weather—from frigid cold to sweltering heat—to venture into the wilds of North America, the rainforests of Africa, the jungles of Asia and the Pacific isles, and the uncharted realms of Central and South America.

White curiosity could not be quenched by any of the hazards faced along the way. Should one expedition and its members not return, new explorers signed up with little hesitation to continue the search for new lands and new opportunities, even though, at the time, even Europeans believed there might be horrifying sea monsters waiting under the waves to swallow their vessels or tribes of ferocious giants waiting in the dense woods to gobble them up in a single bite.

Later, with the perfection of the astrolabe, the magnetic compass, the invention of the sextant, and the creation of accurate charts and maps, things became a bit easier, but still, danger lurked everywhere.

When these explorers reported back to their benefactors (those who paid for these expensive journeys), they related some of the amazing things they had discovered, including vast mineral wealth and natural resources: tons of gold and jewels in Central and South America; expansive forests offering unending amounts of lumber in North America, precious gems in Asia, and startling wildlife in Africa.

But what they also found, nearly everywhere they ventured, were other humans. With the exception of the races found in India, China, Japan, the northern part of the Malay Archipelago, the Aztecs and the Incas, these races were almost universally nearly naked, illiterate, and often possessed pre-Stone Age technology.

Many of these peoples had never even had Stone, Bronze or Iron Ages, had never conceived of a written language, or had any sort of “tools” apart from rocks they picked up off the ground. They had no farms, no regular food supply—and indeed, many were ardent cannibals, including the otherwise comparatively advanced Aztecs and other Amerindians. Clothing, cooking utensils, the wheel, and all other basic components of even the most primitive civilizations were found to be completely absent.

True, there were still remnants of once-advanced cultures in Central and South America, but the natives had seemingly lost the sophisticated architectural and astronomical abilities obviously demonstrated by their ancient forebears, who they all universally described in their legends as bearded, white-skinned, culture-bearing gods.

This huge difference in technology, culture, and basic civilizational artifacts between the races naturally led the White explorers to see themselves as superior. And then it was that the idea of White supremacy and White pathological altruism took root—a bane to the White race ever since.

Instead of leaving these people in their Paleolithic, or pre-Paleolithic state, Whites took on the belief that it was their duty, as a “superior race,” to offer these primitives all the benefits Western man could offer. Motivated by paternalistic munificence and a genuine desire to help “uplift” the races of the world, Whites set about transferring European technology, knowhow, and education to the non-White races of the world and to “rule over them for their own good.”

This was done with a complete misunderstanding of race and its relation to culture. Each race produces a culture, or a civilization, which is reflected by its own innate abilities and values. This the “White supremacists” failed to understand. They believed that, once the non-White races had been “taught” Western civilization and culture, they would all become just like Europeans, only perhaps with different colored skins, and “civilized.”

At the same time all this was happening, the primitives on the receiving end of this White largesse stood in wonder. To the present day, the word for a European person in Central Africa is “mundele,” which literally originates from the sub-Saharan African word for “spirit-like being.”

But therein lies the rub. This awe and wonder of the White man and his magical technology would fade, and, as the non-White races gained the advantage of reading, writing, Western education, and medicine, so did they experience an inevitable political awakening and population explosion.

Now, the former primitives, all using White technology and learning, demand “reparations,” demand “equal rights,” demand “affirmative action” and demand the right to take over and physically occupy the White man’s lands. This process, unless checked, will have a disastrous outcome. Clearly, “White supremacy,” the paternalistic attitude which claimed that Whites had a duty to rule over and uplift the non-White world, was, and is, a catastrophe that might yet see the final extermination of the White race. ❖ —PAUL ANGEL, EXECUTIVE EDITOR.

Print or PDF:

PDF Copy, Print Copy

You may also like…

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top